Uruguay were eliminated from the world cup by Columbia in absence of arguably their best player. Luis Suarez was banned from all football related activities for four months by FIFA one day before the round of sixteen match. This Uruguayan side is not the force it was in the previous world cup with the core of the side remaining unchanged and having declined in the last four years. The most obvious example is Diego Forlan, their best player in the last world cup who is now in the twilight of his career. The midfield and the attack often looks disjointed with a huge burden on the shoulders of Edison Cavani to link the two in addition to his man marking duties. He is so engrossed in the link up play that he often needs someone upfront to provide the finishing touch. Suarez played that role brilliantly, most notably in the game against England. On his day, Suarez is unstoppable and capable of producing cracks in even the strongest of defensive walls but the negative aspects of his personality have always stolen the limelight from his stellar footballing performances.
This is neither the first time that he has been in trouble for his antics on the pitch nor the first time he has sunk his teeth into an opponent. His CV includes racial abuse and wrongfully denying a nation a deserved spot in world cup semi finals. Many have dismissed his handling of a Ghana corner during the last world cup with a winning at all cost mentality excuse but do those same supporters also agree on chomping down opponents qualifying as 'winning mentality'. Liverpool's players and manager supported him when he was banned for racially abusing Patrice Evra and also stood by him when he bit Branislav Ivanovic. A couple of days ago, his Uruguayan teammates were trying to brush this incident under the carpet and describing him as a media target due to his tarnished image. But can anyone disagree on how he has earned that image. Was he a media target on all of these occasions:
1.
2.
3.
Suarez surely is a world class footballer who can win matches on his own, but is that reason enough to lend support to a serial offender who has practiced every form of anti-sportsmanship. Once is a mistake, twice coincidence but three times. Seriously?
This is neither the first time that he has been in trouble for his antics on the pitch nor the first time he has sunk his teeth into an opponent. His CV includes racial abuse and wrongfully denying a nation a deserved spot in world cup semi finals. Many have dismissed his handling of a Ghana corner during the last world cup with a winning at all cost mentality excuse but do those same supporters also agree on chomping down opponents qualifying as 'winning mentality'. Liverpool's players and manager supported him when he was banned for racially abusing Patrice Evra and also stood by him when he bit Branislav Ivanovic. A couple of days ago, his Uruguayan teammates were trying to brush this incident under the carpet and describing him as a media target due to his tarnished image. But can anyone disagree on how he has earned that image. Was he a media target on all of these occasions:
1.
2.
3.
Suarez surely is a world class footballer who can win matches on his own, but is that reason enough to lend support to a serial offender who has practiced every form of anti-sportsmanship. Once is a mistake, twice coincidence but three times. Seriously?









